Samuel Johnson, a prominent 18th-century literary critic, expressed his reaction against William Shakespeare's handling of the distinction of time and place in his work "Preface to Shakespeare," which was written in 1765. In this preface, Johnson discusses various aspects of Shakespeare's plays and provides his critical analysis of the Bard's dramatic techniques.
One of the elements that Johnson critiques in Shakespeare's plays is the lack of strict adherence to the classical principles of unity of time and place. According to the neo-classical rules, as derived from Aristotle's Poetics, a play should take place within a single day (unity of time) and in one location (unity of place). This was seen as a way to maintain the coherence and verisimilitude of the dramatic action.
However, Shakespeare's plays often spanned longer periods of time and included multiple settings, which did not conform to these classical unities. Johnson took issue with this departure from the established rules, as he believed in the importance of adhering to the neo-classical principles of dramatic composition.
Johnson's reaction can be understood in the context of the neo-classical literary movement, which sought to revive the principles of ancient Greece and Rome and apply them to contemporary literature. The neo-classical critics, including Johnson, valued order, reason, and decorum in artistic expression and looked to ancient models as the epitome of artistic excellence.
In his "Preface to Shakespeare," Johnson expresses his admiration for Shakespeare's genius and his unparalleled ability to capture the complexities of human nature and emotions. He acknowledges Shakespeare's mastery in creating vivid characters, realistic dialogue, and powerful imagery. However, Johnson also points out what he perceives as flaws in Shakespeare's works, including the lack of adherence to the unity of time and place.
Johnson argues that Shakespeare's plays, while remarkable in their depth and insight, would have been even more powerful and effective had they adhered to the classical unities. He suggests that Shakespeare's departures from these unities detract from the overall coherence and realism of the plays. According to Johnson, a strict adherence to the unity of time and place would have added to the verisimilitude and heightened the emotional impact of the dramatic action.
However, it is essential to note that Johnson's reaction was shaped by the literary context of his time, influenced by the neo-classical ideals that valued order and restraint in artistic expression. His criticism of Shakespeare's plays for not adhering to the unity of time and place should be viewed in light of his commitment to the neo-classical principles of dramatic composition.
While Johnson's critique of Shakespeare's handling of the unity of time and place is valid from a neo-classical perspective, it is crucial to understand Shakespeare's approach to drama within the context of his own time and artistic intentions. Shakespeare lived during the Elizabethan and Jacobean eras, a period characterized by the flourishing of drama in England. The stage was a place of innovation, experimentation, and popular entertainment, and playwrights like Shakespeare sought to captivate diverse audiences with a variety of themes, emotions, and settings.
Shakespeare's departure from the classical unities allowed him to explore a broader range of human experiences and emotions. His plays often spanned several years or even decades, enabling him to delve deeply into the complexities of character development and the passage of time. This approach gave Shakespeare's works a sense of epic grandeur and a wide-reaching scope, making them more akin to life itself, which does not always adhere to neat, compact timeframes.
Additionally, Shakespeare's use of multiple settings allowed him to create contrasting and interconnected worlds within a single play. His plays moved seamlessly from the royal court to the streets, from palaces to forests, and from magical realms to mortal domains. This dynamic use of settings added richness and depth to his narratives, providing a multi-dimensional backdrop for the unfolding drama.
Moreover, Shakespeare's plays often featured a multitude of characters, each representing different social classes, ages, and perspectives. His portrayal of a diverse range of people and situations contributed to the universality of his themes and the timeless relevance of his works. By transcending the constraints of unity of place and time, Shakespeare captured the essence of human existence and the complexities of the human psyche in a way that continues to resonate with audiences across cultures and centuries.
While Johnson and other neo-classical critics may have perceived Shakespeare's departure from the unity of time and place as a limitation, many modern scholars and literary theorists appreciate the versatility and innovation of Shakespeare's approach to dramatic composition. They recognize that his departure from the classical unities allowed him to create rich, multifaceted narratives that remain relevant and compelling to this day.
In conclusion, Samuel Johnson's reaction against Shakespeare regarding the distinction of time and place should be understood in the context of the neo-classical literary movement, which valued adherence to established rules and principles. While Johnson admired Shakespeare's genius, he critiqued the Bard's departure from the unity of time and place as a deviation from the classical ideals of dramatic composition.
However, Shakespeare's handling of time and place should also be appreciated within the context of his own artistic intentions and the theatrical conventions of his time. His departure from the classical unities allowed him to explore a broad range of human experiences, create contrasting settings, and develop a diverse array of characters. As a result, Shakespeare's works possess a timeless universality and emotional depth that continue to captivate and resonate with audiences worldwide. Rather than detracting from the power of his plays, Shakespeare's innovative approach to dramatic composition has solidified his position as one of the greatest playwrights in history, leaving an indelible mark on the world of literature and drama.
Comments
Post a Comment